Ambiguity isn't something to escape. It's something to design with.
“Ambiguity is the playground of the possible.”
— Michael Bungay Stanier, author of The Coaching Habit
Michael Bungay Stanier has a way of naming what most frameworks skip over. That uncertainty isn't the enemy. It's the entry point.
That's stayed with me for years. Because I've spent most of my career inside that space. Where strategy hasn't fully formed, alignment is still shifting, and outcomes are far from locked. It's full of tension and doubt. But it's also where possibility lives.
That space, between now and next, is where The Possibility Principle of Design was born.
Not as a solution. Not as a system. But as a mindset. A way of navigating complexity without needing to erase it.
Why do good ideas stall?
That question keeps resurfacing. Project after project. Team after team.
It's rarely because of a lack of talent or effort or vision. It's because the transition between what is and what could be is hard to navigate.
Not because people don't care. Because the present often isn't built to support what the future demands.
That middle zone, the murky space between intent and impact, between brief and breakthrough, is where things fall apart. Where teams get stuck. Where alignment slips. Where change slows to a crawl.
But here's the thing. It's also where the real work lives.
What this really is
The Possibility Principle of Design is my attempt to name that space.
Not with a neat model or tidy checklist. But with a way of seeing. A way of working. A way of leading.
Let's be clear. This isn't a plug-and-play process. There's no magic diagram. No five-step formula.
It's about shifting your mindset when momentum stalls, not because the team lacks tools, but because the conditions for progress aren't in place.
And it starts with three core questions I've returned to again and again.
Where are we stuck, and why? What dynamics, assumptions, or invisible forces are keeping us in place?
What shift needs to happen before progress is possible? Are we solving the right problem, or rushing to deliver without pausing to reflect?
How do we design the conditions for momentum, not just deliverables? What needs to change in our environment, relationships, or language for lasting impact to take root?
I know it might sound abstract. That's intentional.
Because possibility doesn't unfold in a straight line. It lives in the in-between, where clarity is fragile and structure alone won't cut it.
This isn't about simplicity. It's about direction.
You won't find a linear process here. Because transformation doesn't happen on slides. It happens in resistance. In reflection. In culture.
This work isn't about cleaning up the mess. It's about making space for it. Not to stay stuck in ambiguity, but to move forward through it.
Yes, you might hear echoes of design thinking or agile or systems leadership. It's adjacent, but different.
What makes this distinct isn't the tools. It's the timing. And the terrain.
The Possibility Principle of Design focuses on the moment before momentum. Where insight needs to become belief. And belief needs to become behavior.
That's not about process. That's about presence.
Why now?
I'm sharing this not because it's finished, but because it's real.
In conversation after conversation with leaders, strategists, designers, I hear the same quiet frustration. "We have the ambition. We have the talent. But we're still stuck."
They don't need another model. They need a way to work through the mess without losing the meaning.
So this isn't a pitch. It's an invitation. A first draft. A glimpse. A space for co-creation.
Let's design what's next
Here's what I'd love to know.
What resonates with you? What questions does this raise? What would help make it more useful in your world?
You don't have to agree with all of it. I welcome the tension. Because this idea isn't meant to be polished. It's meant to evolve.
And it only becomes real through conversation, context, and collaboration.
So if you're navigating change, or helping others do the same, I hope this gives you language for something you've felt all along.
That ambiguity isn't something to escape. It's something to design with.
And possibility? It doesn't begin with certainty. It begins with intention.
Right now, I'm exploring how to make this thinking more actionable. Simple prompts, adaptable maps, lightweight frameworks that help teams and leaders move through uncertainty with clarity and intent.
If this resonates, and you're curious about shaping or testing early versions, I'd love to connect.
This is part of my ongoing exploration of The Possibility Principle of Design.
If you want these ideas in your inbox as they develop, subscribe here.